ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2026
Protective effects of
Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Paracetamol (PCM) is widely used as an analgesic; however, at high doses, it is well recognized for its hepatotoxic effects and is increasingly associated with renal and reproductive damage. Methods: In the present study, the protective potential of ethanolic Results: PCM administration led to pronounced impairment in sperm quality and significant disturbances in serum biochemical parameters, reflected by elevated renal function markers, sodium, and phosphorus levels, together with reduced calcium, potassium, and testosterone. These changes were accompanied by clear evidence of oxidative stress, as indicated by increased malondialdehyde and decreased reduced glutathione. Moreover, inflammatory and apoptotic responses were markedly intensified, whereas antioxidant and steroidogenic regulators were suppressed. Histopathological findings further confirmed extensive structural damage in renal and testicular tissues. Notably, treatment with EELS or NAC substantially mitigated these alterations, restoring most parameters toward normal values. Conclusion: Collectively, these findings demonstrate that EELS exerts notable nephroprotective and gonadoprotective effects comparable to NAC, largely through the attenuation of oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.