ArticleiScience2026
Systemic immunometabolic profiling classifies cisplatin sensitivity states using interpretable machine learning.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cisplatin resistance limits the effectiveness of platinum-based chemotherapy for lung adenocarcinoma, yet practical systemic diagnostics for cisplatin sensitivity are lacking. We developed ImmunoMetabolic Profiling Analysis and Classification Tool (IMPACT), an interpretable machine learning pipeline that selects the best performing model and reduces it to a minimal, mechanistically informative feature set via recursive feature elimination. In a syngeneic orthotopic model, we quantified 25 serum amino acids and 16 immune cell populations across bone marrow, spleen, lung, and mediastinal lymph nodes to capture systemic immunometabolic states. IMPACT classified cisplatin-sensitive versus cisplatin-resistant tumors with high accuracy (AUC = 0.950), driven primarily by bone marrow MDSCs and serum glutamine. Using the same framework, we also classified Cancer (CS + CR) versus no cancer controls with high accuracy (AUC = 0.955), with lung MDSCs and phosphoserine among the top features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.