ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Combined Burst Mode versus Torsional Mode Phacoemulsification for Patients with Hard Nuclear Cataracts: A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06991374 (Combined Burst Mode Versus Torsional Mode Phacoemulsification for Patients With Hard Nuclear Cataract), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Combined Burst Mode Versus Torsional Mode Phacoemulsification for Patients With Hard Nuclear Cataract: A Randomized Control Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the hard nuclear cataract surgery outcomes by comparing the combined burst mode and continuous torsional mode conducted of Centurion Vision System. Methods: Prospective comparative cohort study. Based on the Emery-Little classification, this study assigned cataract patients with nuclear density grade III to V into two groups: the combined mode group (Group A) and the torsional mode group (Group B). Endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT), and best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) were evaluated at different time intervals, including 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. Results: 207 patients: 100 in the group A and 107 in the group B. Patients in group A with severe nuclei experienced lower cumulative dissipated energy (p = 0.007) and shorter ultrasound time (p < 0.001). Both groups exhibited a decrease in ECD after surgery, but the decrease was comparatively lower among group A patients with severe nuclei (p < 0.05). There was a notable increase in the CCT in both groups at the 1-day and 1-week time points compared to the baseline values (p < 0.001). Changes in CCT were significantly greater in group B at 1-day (p < 0.001), 1-week (p = 0.002), and 1-month (p = 0.004) intervals among patients with severe nuclei. Conclusion: Burst torsional combined with longitudinal ultrasound can be more effective for harder nuclei phacoemulsification than the continuous torsional ultrasound. Trial Registration: This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Fudan University's Eye & ENT Hospital. This study was registered as a clinical trial (number: NCT06991374).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.