Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41852705›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

Combined Burst Mode versus Torsional Mode Phacoemulsification for Patients with Hard Nuclear Cataracts: A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study.

Maierdanjiang Ainiwaer, Yingying Hong, Binghe Xiao, Yang Sun, Shaohua Zhang, Li Ning, Houyi Liu, Xiangjia Zhu, Yinghong Ji

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06991374 (Combined Burst Mode Versus Torsional Mode Phacoemulsification for Patients With Hard Nuclear Cataract), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06991374 nacompletednot on this map

Combined Burst Mode Versus Torsional Mode Phacoemulsification for Patients With Hard Nuclear Cataract: A Randomized Control Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorEye & ENT Hospital of Fudan UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled207ConditionsHard Nuclear Cataract, Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery, Endothelial Cell Density Loss, Central Corneal ThicknessArmscombined burst mode, torsional mode
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maierdanjiang Ainiwaer *Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0000-0649-8549
Yingying Hong *Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China.
Binghe XiaoEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China.
Yang SunEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China.
Shaohua ZhangEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China.
Li NingEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China.
Houyi LiuEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China.
Xiangjia ZhuEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6131-9582
Yinghong JiEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-3340-5373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the hard nuclear cataract surgery outcomes by comparing the combined burst mode and continuous torsional mode conducted of Centurion Vision System. Methods: Prospective comparative cohort study. Based on the Emery-Little classification, this study assigned cataract patients with nuclear density grade III to V into two groups: the combined mode group (Group A) and the torsional mode group (Group B). Endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT), and best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) were evaluated at different time intervals, including 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. Results: 207 patients: 100 in the group A and 107 in the group B. Patients in group A with severe nuclei experienced lower cumulative dissipated energy (p = 0.007) and shorter ultrasound time (p < 0.001). Both groups exhibited a decrease in ECD after surgery, but the decrease was comparatively lower among group A patients with severe nuclei (p < 0.05). There was a notable increase in the CCT in both groups at the 1-day and 1-week time points compared to the baseline values (p < 0.001). Changes in CCT were significantly greater in group B at 1-day (p < 0.001), 1-week (p = 0.002), and 1-month (p = 0.004) intervals among patients with severe nuclei. Conclusion: Burst torsional combined with longitudinal ultrasound can be more effective for harder nuclei phacoemulsification than the continuous torsional ultrasound. Trial Registration: This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Fudan University's Eye & ENT Hospital. This study was registered as a clinical trial (number: NCT06991374).

Indexed as

burst modehard nuclear cataractphacoemulsificationtorsional mode

Identifiers

PMID41852705
PMCPMC12994532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.