ArticleFrontiers in microbiomes2026
Maize leaf endosphere microbiome was affected by domestication and shows patterns consistent with microbial dysbiosis.
Article in Frontiers in microbiomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Translational microbiomes in agriculture: microbial communities as tools to effect host and system health for improved crop production.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Whether domestication, post-domestication spread, and breeding affected the maize leaf endosphere microbiota is poorly understood despite the well-known effects of those processes on the crop's genetics and responses to the environment. We examined the leaf endosphere microbial communities associated with three plant groups (Zea mays): teosintes, maize landraces, and maize elite inbreds. The teosintes group included Balsas (Z. mays parviglumis) and perennial (Zea diploperennis) teosinte, and each maize (Z. mays mays) group included genotypes from Mexico and USA. We used 16S-V4 region amplicon sequencing of the leaf endophytic microbiota to infer how the microbial communities of inbred maize may have been shaped by the crop's evolution, and whether they were affected by: (i) the transition from a perennial life history to an annual life history in the teosintes; (ii) domestication of maize from Balsas teosinte; (iii) northward spread of landrace maize from Mexico to the US; and (iii) breeding of landrace maizes to produce elite inbreds. Results: The leaf endophytic microbial community differed among the plant groups and genotypes, and was affected by domestication, as indicated by a decline in bacterial diversity and changes in microbial community structure between wild (teosinte) and domesticated (maize) Zea. While the microbial community structure was stringent and regulated in the teosintes, it was variable in the maize landraces and inbreds, as evidenced by greater distances to centroid based on Euclidean dissimilarity metric. This pattern was suggestive of microbial dysbiosis in the leaf endosphere associated with domestication and is consistent with predictions of the Anna Karenina principle. This finding marks the first evidence of dysbiosis associated with domestication. FAPROTAX predictions suggested that the teosintes may harbor microbial communities enriched in taxa associated with cellulolytic, chitinolytic, and nitrate respiration functions, while the maizes showed higher fermentation and nitrate reduction functions. Conclusions: Our results showed that the leaf endosphere microbial community structures in maize are consistent with alterations associated with dysbiosis. Our findings enhanced our understanding of the effects of anthropogenic processes including crop domestication, spread, and breeding on the leaf endosphere of elite maize cultivars, and may guide the development of evolutionarily-and ecologically sustainable biofertilizers and biocontrol agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.