ArticleNeuroscience applied2026
Statistical process control for real-time monitoring in clinical psychology: State of the art and future research agenda.
Article in Neuroscience applied, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental disorders place a substantial burden on individuals and society, underscoring the need for preventive interventions that can be delivered to the right person at the right time. This, in turn, requires real-time monitoring of person-specific indicators of risk for mental disorders and identifying when risk is increasing. Statistical process control (SPC) procedures, originally developed for monitoring industrial processes, offer a promising framework for addressing this need, allowing for the real-time detection of meaningful person-specific changes. Although SPC has only recently been introduced in clinical psychology, initial empirical applications demonstrate its potential for forecasting changes in mental health. In this perspective, we introduce the main concepts of SPC and describe two prominent SPC procedures (Shewhart and EWMA), outlining when each is most appropriate to use and summarizing current empirical findings in clinical psychology. We also discuss how SPC procedures compare to other change-detection methods. Finally, we discuss recent methodological advances in the use of SPC within clinical psychology and propose a research agenda that identifies key challenges for future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.