ArticleHuman reproduction open2026
Periconceptional GLP-1 receptor agonist exposure and obstetric outcomes: a Danish nationwide cohort study.
Article in Human reproduction open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Tirzepatide in Men Seeking Fertility: A Structured Narrative Review and Proposed Clinical Framework.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Postpartum GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 therapies in women with prior gestational diabetes: current evidence and uncertainties.BMC medicine · 2026Review
- GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, Fertility Restoration, and Reproductive Safety in Women of Reproductive Age: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- When drugs meet disease: disentangling diabetes, obesity, and periconceptional GLP-1 receptor agonist safety.Human reproduction open · 2026Article
- Beauty standards and reproductive health: increasing use of GLP-1 receptor agonists despite limited evidence.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Article
- Exploring the multifaceted roles of GLP-1 receptor agonists; a comprehensive review.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionWhat is the association between periconceptional GLP-1 receptor agonist exposure and risk of obstetric complications? SUMMARY ANSWER: Periconceptional GLP-1 receptor agonist exposure was associated with increased preterm birth risk when used for diabetes treatment (liraglutide aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.17-2.48; semaglutide aOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.24-2.7) but not for weight management, suggesting the underlying diabetes rather than the medication may be the causal factor. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: GLP-1 receptor agonists are rapidly expanding in use among reproductive-age women for diabetes and obesity treatment. While not approved for use in pregnancy, inadvertent periconceptional exposure occurs frequently. Limited safety data exist, with recent small studies suggesting no increased risk of major congenital malformations, but comprehensive obstetric outcome data remain lacking. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This nationwide observational cohort study used data from Danish health registries from October 2009 through December 2023. We analyzed 756 636 singleton pregnancies among 480 231 women, with 529 pregnancies having periconceptional GLP-1 receptor agonist exposure. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING
methodsWe identified periconceptional liraglutide or semaglutide exposure (prescription redemption within 8 weeks before/after last menstrual period) using the National Prescription Register. Exposed pregnancies were stratified by maternal pre-existing diabetes status and compared with propensity score-matched unexposed controls. Propensity score matching incorporated maternal age, BMI, smoking, geographic region, education, pre-existing diabetes, parity, and temporal factors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Before adjustment, exposed women had higher rates of multiple obstetric complications. After propensity score matching, only the risk of preterm birth remained elevated for exposed women. This increased risk was confined to women using GLP-1 receptor agonists for diabetes treatment (liraglutide aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.17-2.48; semaglutide aOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.24-2.71). Among women without pre-existing diabetes using these medications for weight management, no association with preterm birth was observed (liraglutide aOR 1.01, 95% CI 0.58-1.76; semaglutide aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.30-1.70). LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Study limitations include the absence of data regarding medication compliance post prescription redemption, potential misclassification due to parallel importation, and the inability to control for unmeasured confounding factors. The observational design cannot establish causality. Most semaglutide weight-loss prescriptions occurred late in the study period, limiting long-term follow-up data. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThe results are compatible with the hypothesis that diabetes-related factors, rather than GLP-1 receptor agonist exposure itself, may contribute to the increased preterm birth risk. If so, there are important implications for preconception counselling and may inform future guidelines for GLP-1 receptor agonist use in reproductive-age women. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: KVRH, KB, DW, and HSN acknowledge funding from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF21OC0069257 and NNF220C0077221) and the AP Moller Foundation. LMH was supported in part by grants from NordForsk (id: 105545), the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF17OC0027594 and NNF17OC0027812), and the Villum Foundation ('Nation-Scale Social Networks'). KSL was supported by the Independent Research Fund Denmark (8045-00047B), NordForsk (id: 156298), and Centre for Childhood Health (id: 72 2024_F_008 and 2024_I_001). SM: Advisory boards: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Intarcia Therapeutics, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Abbott Lab, Bayer, Amgen; Lecture fees: AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, MSD; Research grant recipient: Novo Nordisk; Novo Nordisk foundation, Boehringer Ingelheim; Support for attending meetings and/or travel: Novo Nordisk, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bayer. Grants were paid to the institution, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, with no personal fee. None of the grants has any relation to the work presented in the paper. SM is also a consultant for Netdoktor and has served as principal investigator in relation to the development of drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity in collaboration with Novo Nordisk and Bayer, with funds paid to the institution where he is employed, with no personal fee and with no relation to the work reported in this article. HSN: lecture fees on own research: Novo Nordisk A/S, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck A/S, Astra Zeneca, Cook Medical, Gedeon Richter and Ibsa Nordic. K.B holds stock/share or stock/share options with Novonesis, Genmab, and Novo Nordisk (held in personal investment portfolio). The remaining authors have no other disclosures. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.