ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
A comprehensive evaluation of non-vascular prepontine cistern anatomy influencing trigeminal nerve vulnerability using machine learning-based morphometric analysis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a severe neuropathic pain disorder traditionally attributed to neurovascular compression. However, emerging evidence suggests that non-vascular anatomical variations of the prepontine cistern may significantly contribute to disease susceptibility. Objective: To quantify non-vascular morphometric features of the trigeminal nerve and adjacent cistern and evaluate their discriminative value using a leakage-free, machine-learning-based MRI pipeline. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 131 participants (71 with idiopathic TN (iTN) and 60 controls) who were imaged with temporal MRI. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed the neurovascular conflict status, achieving inter-rater agreement of 97% ( Results: TN showed thinner nerve diameters (particularly at the porus), larger Meckel cave areas (axial and coronal) and height, smaller sagittal angles, and shorter cisternal length; several of these differences remained significant after multiple-comparison control (e.g., porus diameters and Meckel cave areas, Holm-adjusted Conclusion: Non-vascular morphometric variation in the prepontine cistern, particularly at the porus level nerve caliber, Meckel cave size, and sagittal angle, contributes to TN pathophysiology. An AI-assisted, leakage-free morphometry pipeline yields reproducible and interpretable discrimination, supporting the integration of vascular and non-vascular anatomy into diagnostic and treatment planning workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.