ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2026
From clinical phenotypes to genomic signatures: machine learning integration for precision tuberculosis treatment prediction.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing the gut microbiome to combat tuberculosis: a technological and clinical review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- The eight pillars of within-host tuberculosis modelling.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health threat, causing approximately 1.5 million deaths each year. Despite progress in treatment, 15%-20% of patients still experience treatment failure or relapse, highlighting the urgent need for precise predictive tools for early identification of high-risk patients. Current methods based on clinical parameters have limitations in prediction accuracy and revealing potential biological mechanisms. Methods: This study developed and validated an innovative multi-omics integration prediction model. We retrospectively collected clinical data from 467 tuberculosis patients and integrated transcriptomic data from three independent public cohorts (GSE19491, GSE31312, GSE83456), involving 3,240 differentially expressed genes. Through advanced feature engineering and bioinformatics analysis, key features were selected. We systematically evaluated 12 machine learning algorithms and adopted an ensemble learning strategy to construct the final model. Model performance was evaluated through strict cross-validation and prospective validation cohorts. Results: Clinical data analysis identified age, body mass index (BMI), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as significant predictors of treatment response. Transcriptomic analysis revealed 1,247 differentially expressed genes between responders and non-responders, enriched in immune response and metabolic pathways. Among the tested algorithms, the ensemble model based on Extra Trees performed the best, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.986, significantly superior to models using only clinical data (AUC = 0.850) or only genomic data (AUC = 0.820). Feature importance analysis confirmed CRP, specific gene features (such as DNA repair and interferon response pathways), age, and BMI as the most important predictors. External validation confirmed the model's robustness (AUC = 0.972). Conclusion: This study successfully developed a high-precision prediction model integrating clinical and genomics data, capable of early identification of high-risk patients with poor treatment response. The model demonstrates excellent prediction performance and generalization ability, providing a powerful tool for moving towards tuberculosis precision medicine, guiding individualized treatment strategies to improve patient prognosis and control the spread of drug resistance. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, ChiCTR2300074328, 03/08/2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.