ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2026
The ontogeny of sex differences in exercise performance.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The ontogeny of sex differences in exercise performance.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sex differences in adult athletic performance are driven by the 20-to 30-fold increase in testosterone production of male puberty creating larger and stronger muscle, bone and cardiorespiratory functions, and higher hemoglobin creating male physical advantages in power sports, where strength, speed, or endurance determine success. Before puberty, boys also surpass girls in age-group records despite no difference in circulating testosterone over the decade from minipuberty to puberty. However, the relative magnitude of the prepubertal, relative to pubertal, sex differences in exercise performance remain uncertain. To investigate the magnitude of these differences in a unitary dataset, this was a secondary analysis of a exercise performance of 85 347 healthy 9- to 17-year-old Australian schoolchildren between 1985 to 2009. Boys surpassed girls in 8 of 9 exercises excepting 1, a stretching exercise, in which girls surpassed boys. For each exercise the magnitude of the pubertal changes were much larger than those of prepubertal differences. These findings in normative tests extend previous studies of competitive age records of prepubertal children and compare the same tests over the pubertal transition. These findings confirm that the quantitatively dominant sex differences in exercise performance are those of puberty. That at least 1 prepubertal exercise test is dominated by girls indicates that the prepubertal differences are more likely to be biological rather than sociological, related to boy's greater habitual play or exercise. It is postulated that these prepubertal sex differences may arise from the combination of androgen imprinting during minipuberty propagated by muscle memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.