Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41852432›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiomes2025

Effects of wetting events on mass timber surface microbial communities and VOC emissions: implications for building operation and occupant well-being.

Gwynne Á Mhuireach, Susan Collins, Leslie Dietz, Patrick Finn Horve, Aurélie Laguerre, Dale Northcutt, Jason Stenson, Kevin Van Den Wymelenberg, Elliott Gall, Mark Fretz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gwynne Á MhuireachInstitute for Health in the Built Environment, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Susan CollinsInstitute for Health in the Built Environment, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Leslie DietzInstitute for Health in the Built Environment, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Patrick Finn HorveInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Aurélie LaguerreSalk Institute for Biological Studies, San Diego, CA, United States.
Dale NorthcuttInstitute for Health in the Built Environment, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Jason StensonInstitute for Health in the Built Environment, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Kevin Van Den WymelenbergInstitute for Health in the Built Environment, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Elliott GallHealthy Buildings Research Laboratory, Portland State University, Portland, OR, United States.
Mark FretzInstitute for Health in the Built Environment, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Humans have used wood as a construction material throughout history. Currently, mass timber products, such as cross-laminated timber (CLT), are becoming more popular as a structural material, since they are renewable and have a lower carbon footprint than concrete or steel. Nonetheless, some building types, such as healthcare, veterinary, and food manufacturing, avoid using structural mass timber due to concerns about microbial growth in the event of wetting. One solution is to use protective coatings on mass timber products to increase moisture resistance, although the coatings themselves may generate concerns about volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions. Natural uncoated wood also produces VOCs, some of which may have intrinsic antimicrobial effects. Methods: In this study, we inoculated coated and uncoated cross- laminated timber (CLT) blocks with a mock microbial community and isolated each block within individual sealed microcosms. We characterized VOCs and surface microbial communities from the CLT blocks before, during, and after wetting periods of varying durations. VOC concentration and emission rate were analyzed with chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), while microbial community abundance, diversity, and composition were analyzed through qPCR and shotgun metagenomics. Results: VOC emissions were elevated immediately after inoculation, then decreased through the remainder of the experiment, except for a plateau during the wetting period. VOCs from uncoated CLT blocks were primarily terpenes, while coated blocks emitted VOCs associated with coatings, plastics, and industrial solvents, as well as terpenes. One VOC-acetoin (3-hydroxy, 2-butanone)-was present at high levels across all samples immediately after microbial inoculation. Bacteria comprised 99.54% of the identified microbial sequences. The plastic control microcosm (not containing a CLT block) had higher abundance of viable bacteria for the majority of the study, but there was no difference in abundance between coated and uncoated blocks. Prior to wetting periods, microbial composition was driven primarily by sampling day, whereas surface type played a larger role during and after wetting periods.

Indexed as

cross-laminated timberevidence based designgreen buildingsshotgun metagenomicsterpenes

Identifiers

PMID41852432
PMCPMC12993639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.