Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41852389›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiomes2025

The EDEN ISS mobile test facility microbiome changes by cleaning and continued use.

Luis Gaiser, Kristina Beblo-Vranesevic, Rob Van Houdt, Jana Fahrion, Louise Gillet de Chalonge, Jess M Bunchek, Paul Zabel, Daniel Schubert, Petra Rettberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luis GaiserAerospace Microbiology Working Group, Department of Applied Aerospace Biology, Institute for Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany.
Kristina Beblo-VranesevicAerospace Microbiology Working Group, Department of Applied Aerospace Biology, Institute for Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany.
Rob Van HoudtMicrobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Jana FahrionMicrobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Louise Gillet de ChalongeLife Sciences Institute, School of Chemical Science, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Jess M BunchekPlanetary Infrastructures Working Group, Department of System Analysis Space Segment, Institute of Space Systems, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Bremen, Germany.
Paul ZabelPlanetary Infrastructures Working Group, Department of System Analysis Space Segment, Institute of Space Systems, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Bremen, Germany.
Daniel SchubertPlanetary Infrastructures Working Group, Department of System Analysis Space Segment, Institute of Space Systems, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Bremen, Germany.
Petra RettbergAerospace Microbiology Working Group, Department of Applied Aerospace Biology, Institute for Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Bioregenerative life support systems (BLSS) utilizing plants and/or microorganisms to provide the crew of a spacecraft with food, clean water, breathable air, and other amenities are likely to form key components of future long-distance spaceflight missions. Extensive testing and validation of such technologies are necessary before they can be implemented. EDEN ISS was a platform in Antarctica that tested various plant cultivation technologies for a BLSS. To ensure the continued operation of a BLSS, it is vital that plants remain healthy, which necessitates the monitoring of the plant production facility microbiome to ensure that pathogens are detected early and countermeasures can be engaged. Methods: Swab surface samples collected in the EDEN ISS Mobile Test Facility (MTF) during different campaigns were used to estimate the bioburden of the various surfaces via viable count. Isolates obtained from the cultivation of the surface samples were identified via partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Additionally, 16S amplicon sequencing was performed on DNA extracted directly from the swab samples to characterize the microbiome. Results and discussion: The results revealed that the bioburden of the different sampling positions was not significantly reduced by cleaning, indicating that the employed cleaning regime was unsuited in its current form to adequately lower the bioburden. Identification of the isolates, as well as the full microbiome, revealed mostly environmental genera. However, in both cases, genera containing plant as well as human pathogens, like

Indexed as

Antarcticabioregenerative life support system (BLSS)built environmentgreenhouseplant cultivation technologiessurface microbiome

Identifiers

PMID41852389
PMCPMC12993677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.