ReviewFrontiers in microbiomes2025
Chemistry, manufacturing, and controls for live microbial products: addressing classification challenges and enhancing process validation.
Review in Frontiers in microbiomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic microbial communities: emerging live biotherapeutics for targeted gut microbiome modulation.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- Engineered live bacteria for liver diseases and gut-liver axis disorders: from genetic modification to advanced delivery systems.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Probiotic drug interactions in ulcerative colitis: a microbiota and metabolite perspective.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional process validation life cycles need to be tailored to the specific needs of live microbial products (LMPs). LMPs can be divided into subcategories, and the product characteristics are the basis for the regulatory category and thereby the applicable guidelines. All LMPs fall under regulations related to GMP-compliant manufacturing; however, there are live microbial specific challenges. Both the FDA and the EMA do not have a regulatory framework for LMPs administered by injection. Full adherence to general guidelines for injectables is technically not feasible for LMPs, as sterility is required, which stands in conflict with living organisms as a product. Safety-related critical quality attributes (CQAs) of such LMPs typically include the absence of contaminants and proof of monoseptic condition of the product. This paper aims to holistically outline and compare LMP-relevant guidelines while highlighting different subcategories. Additionally, the status of the field is captured by collecting all LMP-related clinical trials to resolve specific challenges in LMP development. Taken together, this overview will aid in bringing future LMPs from development to commercialization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.