Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41852387›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiomes2025

Chemistry, manufacturing, and controls for live microbial products: addressing classification challenges and enhancing process validation.

Ralph Slijkerman, Rob van Dijk, Nasser Mohieddin, Ivana Ciarlante, Antal de Jong, Moira Monika Schuler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ralph SlijkermanDepartment of Manufacturing Science and Technology (Production), Wacker Biotech B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Rob van DijkClient and Contract Management Department, Wacker Biotech B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Nasser MohieddinClient and Contract Management Department, Wacker Biotech US, San Diego, CA, United States.
Ivana CiarlanteDepartment of Manufacturing Science and Technology (Production), Wacker Biotech B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Antal de JongBioProcess Development Department, Wacker Biotech B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Moira Monika SchulerClient and Contract Management Department, Wacker Biotech US, San Diego, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional process validation life cycles need to be tailored to the specific needs of live microbial products (LMPs). LMPs can be divided into subcategories, and the product characteristics are the basis for the regulatory category and thereby the applicable guidelines. All LMPs fall under regulations related to GMP-compliant manufacturing; however, there are live microbial specific challenges. Both the FDA and the EMA do not have a regulatory framework for LMPs administered by injection. Full adherence to general guidelines for injectables is technically not feasible for LMPs, as sterility is required, which stands in conflict with living organisms as a product. Safety-related critical quality attributes (CQAs) of such LMPs typically include the absence of contaminants and proof of monoseptic condition of the product. This paper aims to holistically outline and compare LMP-relevant guidelines while highlighting different subcategories. Additionally, the status of the field is captured by collecting all LMP-related clinical trials to resolve specific challenges in LMP development. Taken together, this overview will aid in bringing future LMPs from development to commercialization.

Indexed as

classificationcommercializationinjectionlive bacterial therapeutic (LBT)live biotherapeutic product (LBP)live microbial product (LMP)monosepticregulatory

Identifiers

PMID41852387
PMCPMC12993586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.