Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41852370›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2026

Co-Administration Treatment in Drug-Naïve Major Depression: Exploratory Real-World Patterns and Predictors in China.

Jiamiao Wu, Yuchuan Zou, Jia Zhou, Fanchao Meng, Le Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiamiao Wu *Beijing Key Laboratory of Intelligent Drug Research and Development for Mental Disorders; National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders; National Center for Mental Disorders; Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yuchuan Zou *Beijing Key Laboratory of Intelligent Drug Research and Development for Mental Disorders; National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders; National Center for Mental Disorders; Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0009-8259-1919
Jia ZhouBeijing Key Laboratory of Intelligent Drug Research and Development for Mental Disorders; National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders; National Center for Mental Disorders; Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Fanchao MengBeijing Key Laboratory of Intelligent Drug Research and Development for Mental Disorders; National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders; National Center for Mental Disorders; Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Le XiaoBeijing Key Laboratory of Intelligent Drug Research and Development for Mental Disorders; National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders; National Center for Mental Disorders; Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4323-036X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Co-administration of psychotropic medications is common in major depressive disorder (MDD), yet its patterns and predictors remain underexplored in drug-naïve patients. This study aimed to characterize the prevalence and correlates of co-administration strategies at treatment initiation in China. Methods: In this multicenter, real-world study, we enrolled 1330 drug-naïve adults experiencing a depressive episode. Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment data were collected at baseline. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses identified factors associated with co-administration. Results: Co-administration was utilized in 27.14% of patients. Antipsychotic augmentation was the most common strategy (18.87%), surpassing the use of multiple antidepressants (7.89%), while mood stabilizers (lithium 3.76%; valproate 2.78%) were less frequent. Patients receiving co-administration were typically male, older, had lower education/income, and more severe depressive symptoms. The most prescribed adjunctive antidepressants were SNRIs, NaSSAs, bupropion, and trazodone; the most common antipsychotics were quetiapine, olanzapine, aripiprazole, and risperidone. Multivariable analyses identified sympathetic arousal (OR=1.64) and leaden paralysis (OR=1.30) as key independent predictors. Conclusion: Co-administration, particularly with antipsychotics, is frequently employed at the first treatment encounter for MDD in China. This practice appears to be a symptom-driven approach, targeting specific features like sympathetic arousal and leaden paralysis, which may reflect a pragmatic adaptation to local clinical realities beyond standard guidelines. Due to exploratory nature of the study, these findings are just hypothesis-generating, warranting further validation through more robust, longitudinal studies.

Indexed as

antipsychoticsChinaco-administrationdrug-naïvemajor depressive disorderreal-world study

Identifiers

PMID41852370
PMCPMC12994391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.