ArticleJHLT open2026
The role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the management of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease due to anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody dermatomyositis: A case series and brief literature review.
Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acute respiratory distress mimickers: a practical approach for intensivists.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) from anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody (anti-MDA5) dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare condition associated with up to 63% mortality. Despite aggressive medical treatment, many patients require escalating levels of respiratory support. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a rescue therapy for these patients, intended as a bridge to lung transplantation. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who were treated at our center between 2021 and 2025. Baseline characteristics, treatments, complications, and outcomes are described and presented herein. A literature review was performed to compare our outcomes for patients with anti-MDA5 DM placed on ECMO with those reported elsewhere. Results: The study included 9 patients (5 females and 4 males) with RP-ILD due to anti-MDA5 DM. All patients were treated with high-dose corticosteroids and a variety of other immunosuppressive therapies. Eight patients were placed on veno-venous (V-V) ECMO and one patient was placed on veno-arterialvenous (V-AV) ECMO. All patients were evaluated for lung transplant candidacy. Eight of nine patients were deemed ineligible for lung transplant, most commonly due to severe deconditioning, and died in the ICU. One patient was successfully bridged to bilateral lung transplant after 3 days on ECMO and is currently 30 months post-transplant.A retrospective review of published studies found 79 patients with anti-MDA5 DM induced-RP-ILD requiring ECMO support. Twenty-eight (35.4%) patients were bridged to transplant (average time on ECMO 18 days), 46 (58.2%) died in the ICU (average time on ECMO 28 days), and only 4 (5%) were successfully bridged to recovery (average time on ECMO 44 days). Outcomes for 1 patient were not reported. Conclusion: RP-ILD due to anti-MDA5 DM is associated with a high rate of mortality despite current medical therapies. ECMO as a bridge to recovery is very unlikely (∼5%, 4/79) for these patients; thus, lung transplant should be pursued expeditiously, particularly given the possible association between shorter time on ECMO and successful transplantation. Transfer to an ECMO and lung transplant center is crucial since immunosuppression decisions should be made in a multidisciplinary fashion (lung transplant, rheumatology, etc.) as these decisions can affect lung transplant candidacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.