Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41852246›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026

Titration of nicotine intake in smokers switching to reduced nicotine content cigarettes with access to alternative nicotine systems: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

Neal L Benowitz, Jiayi Hu, Xianghua Luo, F Joseph McClernon, Jennifer Tidey, Andrew A Strasser, Suzanne Colby, Eric C Donny, Dorothy K Hatsukami

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03272685 (Impact of Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes in a Complex Marketplace Part of "Evaluating New Nicotine Standards for Cigarettes"), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03272685 phase3completednot on this map

Impact of Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes in a Complex Marketplace Part of "Evaluating New Nicotine Standards for Cigarettes"

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2018 to 2023Enrolled799ConditionsTobacco Smoking, Nicotine DependenceArmsVery Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes, Normal Nicotine Content Cigarettes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Neal L BenowitzDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2041-8124
Jiayi HuDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Xianghua LuoDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7501-6582
F Joseph McClernonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Jennifer TideyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Andrew A StrasserDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Suzanne ColbyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2027-5936
Eric C DonnyDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Dorothy K HatsukamiMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1108-2609

Funding

National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support P30CA077598National Institute of Drug Abuse and the Food and Drug Administration‧s Center for Tobacco Products U54DA031659National Institutes of Health‧s National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences UL1TR002494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsMandated reduction of the nicotine content of cigarettes to reduce addictiveness to minimal levels has the potential to substantially reduce combusted cigarette use and promote public health. This paper examined the hypothesis that when people who smoke cigarettes are switched to very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes and provided with access to non-combusted alternative nicotine delivery systems (ANDS), they will titrate nicotine to maintain baseline levels of nicotine intake with the use of ANDS.

designThis is a secondary analysis of a recently published randomized clinical trial. Clinical trial number NCT03272685.

settingMulticenter clinical trial conducted in the United States.

participants438 individuals who smoked 5 to 40 cigarettes per day, mean age 44 (range 20-73).

interventionSmokers were randomized 1:1 for 12 weeks of smoking Spectrum brand research cigarettes containing VLNC (0.4 mg nicotine/g tobacco) or normal nicotine content (15.8 mg nicotine/g, NNC). Participants purchased tobacco products from an experimental marketplace containing non-combusted ANDS, including electronic cigarettes, nicotine replacement medications and oral nicotine products. MEASUREMENTS: Measures taken at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks included cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) and measures of ANDS use, assessed using past 3-day daily diary data, which would roughly account for nicotine intake as measured by urine total nicotine equivalents (TNE). Based on self-report and biomarker data at weeks 4, 8 and 12, we characterized three product-using groups of participants as cigarette-only users, ANDS-only users and dual users. Nicotine titration was assessed as the ratio of urine TNE at various research cigarette study weeks compared with baseline (smoking their own cigarettes). Combusted product abstinence was examined using expired carbon monoxide (CO) and adherence to smoking VLNC by urine anatabine.

findingsMedian titration at 12 weeks in cigarette-only participants was 0.84 (interquartile range 0.68-1.18) in the NNC group and 0.05 (0.01-0.12) in the VLNC group. Median titration at 12 weeks in ANDS-only participants was 0.81 (0.69-1.16) in the NNC group and 0.89 (0.49-1.58) in the VLNC group. Median titration at 12 weeks in dual use participants was 1.0 (0.78-1.29) in the NNC group and 0.91 (0.61-1.25) in the VLNC group.

conclusionsMost adults who smoke, when switched to very low nicotine content cigarettes, will use available alternative nicotine delivery systems (ANDS) to supplement their intake of nicotine. Provision of ANDS appears to be associated with a high degree of nicotine titration. Making less harmful ANDS widely available may make a mandated nicotine reduction intervention more acceptable to people who smoke.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsNicotineSmoking CessationTobacco ProductsTobacco Use Cessation DevicesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNicotine Replacement TherapyUnited StatesYoung AdultNicotinecigaretteselectronic cigarettesnicotine delivery systemsreduced nicotine cigarettestitrationtobacco product regulation

Identifiers

PMID41852246
PMCPMC13291075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.