ArticleAnaesthesia2026
Effects of anaesthesia type on development of persistent postoperative opioid utilisation: a South Korean nationwide cohort study.
Article in Anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mode of anaesthesia and persistent postoperative opioid use.Anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Mode of anaesthesia and persistent postoperative opioid use: A reply.Anaesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPrevious studies comparing the effects of general and regional anaesthesia on postoperative opioid use have focused primarily on the immediate postoperative period, with limited investigations into long-term outcomes.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 558,944 patients aged ≥ 18 y who underwent one of nine surgical procedures (thoracotomy; total hip arthroplasty; total knee arthroplasty; shoulder arthroplasty; transurethral resection of the prostate; inguinal hernia repair; knee arthroscopy; varicose vein surgery; and caesarean section) that required regional anaesthesia, general anaesthesia or combined general/regional anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of persistent postoperative opioid utilisation, which was defined as having filled ≥ 10 prescriptions or a supply of > 120 days between postoperative days 91 and 365. Age, sex, medical comorbidities, pre-operative medications and surgery type were balanced among regional anaesthesia, general anaesthesia and combined general/regional anaesthesia using pairwise propensity score matching.
resultsGeneral anaesthesia had significantly higher odds than regional anaesthesia for the development of persistent postoperative opioid utilisation (odds ratio 2.13, 95%CI 1.50-3.01, p < 0.001). The odds ratio of general anaesthesia vs. combined general/regional anaesthesia was significant in patients undergoing thoracotomy (odds ratio 1.47, 95%CI 1.25-1.74, p < 0.001). In the overall population, the regional anaesthesia group consumed fewer opioids than the other groups. Among the patients undergoing thoracotomy, the combined general/regional anaesthesia group consumed fewer opioids than the general anaesthesia group. DISCUSSION: This study found that regional anaesthesia was associated with a reduction in persistent postoperative opioid utilisation, particularly in patients undergoing thoracotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.