Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41852106›Full record

ArticleTransplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society

Cytomegalovirus "Blips" and Rates of Progression to Clinically Significant CMV in Cardiothoracic Transplant Recipients.

Alison M Samsel, Sara Strout, Robin K Avery, Errol L Bush, M Veronica Dioverti, Heba H Mostafa, Paul J Scheel, Pali D Shah, Priya Umapathi, Brian K Lindner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alison M SamselDepartment of Pharmacy, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Sara StroutDepartment of Pharmacy, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9345-9894
Robin K AveryDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7692-3619
Errol L BushDivision of Thoracic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1251-8467
M Veronica DiovertiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5326-9551
Heba H MostafaDepartment of Pathology, Division of Medical Microbiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Paul J ScheelDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4268-516X
Pali D ShahDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6021-1027
Priya UmapathiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1872-6753
Brian K LindnerDepartment of Pharmacy, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9766-9496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines suggest using a highly sensitive, quantitative nucleic acid test (QNAT) for CMV detection; however, there is no standardized threshold to guide preemptive therapy or initiation of CMV treatment. This study sought to characterize the incidence, time course, and management of CMV blips as well as the rate of progression to clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi) following a blip in cardiothoracic transplant recipients.

methodsThis is a single-center, retrospective study of heart and lung transplant recipients from January 2018 to August 2024. A CMV blip was defined as the first positive, detectable, and unquantifiable CMV-QNAT. CS-CMVi was defined as either viral load > 1000 IU/mL or initiation of treatment following a blip. Outcomes were assessed within 1 year of transplant.

resultsOf the 196 patients included in the study, 58 patients (29.6%) had a CMV blip. A majority of patients (62.1%) were receiving CMV prophylaxis at the time of blip. The median time from transplant to CMV blip was 77.5 days and median time to CS-CMVi, from blip, was 30 days. In the CMV high-risk group (D+/R-), 71.4% (10/14) developed CS-CMVi, compared with 21.4% (9/42) in the moderate risk group (R+) (p = 0.001).

conclusionIn the first year following cardiothoracic transplantation, CMV blips are common occurrences. Patients at high-risk for CMV were more likely to progress to CS-CMVi than moderate risk patients. In the high-risk population, this increased rate of progression gives further evidence that a CMV blip is a risk for the progression of CS-CMVi in the absence of treatment.

Indexed as

CytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsHeart TransplantationLung TransplantationAdultAgedAntiviral AgentsDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTransplant RecipientsViral LoadAntiviral AgentsCMV DNAemiacytomegalovirusheart transplantlung transplant

Identifiers

PMID41852106
PMCPMC13450337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.