ReviewJournal of pregnancy2026
HPV in Pregnancy: Implications for Screening, Vaccination, and Maternal-Fetal Health.
Review in Journal of pregnancy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- HPV in Pregnancy: Implications for Screening, Vaccination, and Maternal-Fetal Health.Journal of pregnancy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the most common sexually transmitted infection worldwide. It is highly prevalent among women of reproductive age. During pregnancy, hormonal changes and immunological modulation may promote viral persistence, thus likely increasing the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, the clinical significance of HPV infection in pregnancy remains incompletely understood. This qualitative thematic analysis is aimed at evaluating the epidemiological and clinical impact of HPV during pregnancy, focusing on pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic challenges, obstetric and perinatal outcomes, and gaps in clinical management. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Scopus was conducted for peer-reviewed original studies published in the last 10 years in English. The review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Of 1667 records initially identified, 34 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Given the heterogeneity of study designs and outcomes, a thematic narrative synthesis was performed. Four major themes emerged: (1) pregnancy-related immunological, hormonal, and microbiome changes that facilitate HPV persistence; (2) diagnostic challenges arising from physiological cervical changes that affect cytology and colposcopy accuracy; (3) associations between maternal HPV infection and adverse outcomes such as preterm birth, premature rupture of membranes, miscarriage, low birth weight, and vertical transmission; and (4) disparities in screening and vaccination policies between high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries. While HPV is not directly teratogenic, evidence suggests it may indirectly compromise placental function and the integrity of the cervix. In conclusion, HPV infection during pregnancy is a clinically relevant concern with potential implications for both maternal and fetal health. Standardized screening strategies, improved vaccination coverage, and longitudinal studies are needed to guide evidence-based clinical practice and policy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.