Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851987›Full record

ArticleApplied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM2026

MHC Class I and PD-L1 Expression May Predict Treatment Response to Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy in Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer Patients.

Joseph L Maniaci, Hijun Ryu, Anne M Mills, Patrick Dillon, Elizabeth M Gaughan, Taylor M Jenkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph L ManiaciDepartment of Pathology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Hijun RyuSchool of Medicine.
Anne M MillsDepartment of Pathology.
Patrick DillonDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Elizabeth M GaughanDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Taylor M JenkinsDepartment of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA.ORCID 0000-0001-5776-2370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although immune checkpoint inhibition has proven to be efficacious in a subset of breast cancer patients, there remains a heterogeneity in clinical responses. Major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) expression has been touted as a possible predictor of response to immune checkpoint inhibition given its role in the adaptive immune system. Loss of tumoral MHC I expression in breast cancer as an evasion of immune checkpoint inhibition has been described; however, outcome data are limited. We herein evaluate the relationship between PD-L1 and MHC I expression and response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in a cohort of treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Best treatment response was assessed in 46 metastatic TNBC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibition with or without chemotherapy. Primary tumors were evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for expression of PD-L1 and MHC I. PD-L1 was scored via the combined positive score (CPS). MHC I was evaluated for retention, partial loss (≥10%), or complete loss within the tumor cells. Models using logistic ordinal regression were constructed to determine the ability of PD-L1 and MHC I by IHC to predict treatment response. The best responses by RECIST 1.1 were 16 (34%) with complete response (CR), 15 (33%) with partial response (PR), and 15 (33%) with stable or progressive disease (no response; NR). Of the patients with CR, 13 (87%) had retained MHC, and of those, 12 (92%) were positive for PD-L1. Of the patients with PR, 7 (47%) had retained MHC, and of those, 4 (57%) were positive for PD-L1. Of the patients with NR, 8 had partial or complete loss of MHC (53%), and of those, all (100%) expressed PD-L1. We found that MHC I status is independently and significantly associated with treatment response ( P =0.024), with intact MHC I more common in complete responders and partial or complete loss of MHC I more common in partial responders and nonresponders. We found no association between PD-L1 expression alone with treatment response in our cohort of TNBC patients. Loss of tumoral MHC I expression is more frequently seen in patients without treatment response, despite most of these tumors having some PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥1). Using a logistical ordinal regression model, we found that both MHC I and binary PD-L1 (bPD-L1) status play significant roles in the prediction of grouped treatment response (MHC I P =0.002 and bPD-L1 P =0.03). Additional studies evaluating MHC I loss as a potential barrier to successful immune checkpoint inhibition are needed to ascertain the potential use of MHC I as a predictive biomarker in combination with PD-L1.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHistocompatibility Antigens Class IImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasm ProteinsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisTreatment OutcomeB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanHistocompatibility Antigens Class IImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasm ProteinsPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptorbreast cancerimmune checkpoint inhibitionMHC class IPD-L1TNBC

Identifiers

PMID41851987
PMCPMC13143366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.