ReviewPlant physiology2026
AI-enabled protein design facilitates future plant research and crop breeding.
Review in Plant physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-assisted crop improvement: new design tools within established regulatory frameworks.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to reshape the research paradigm of the life sciences by rapidly advancing the adoption of protein language models and their derivative tools. These technologies are increasingly being applied to protein structure prediction, function analysis, and protein design throughout the life sciences, and have only recently begun to gain attention within the plant science community. Moreover, while the era of AI-driven bio-breeding is on the horizon, it remains largely in the proof-of-concept stage. Therefore, there is a pressing need not only to outline the fundamental principles, models, and tools in this rapidly evolving field, but also to explore their potential applications in plant research and crop breeding. This review begins by introducing general principles and widely used models for protein understanding and generation, supported by illustrative case studies that highlight how these tools are advancing fundamental plant research. For instance, the analyses of 2 maize (Zea mays) genes demonstrate how a structure-aware interpretation of the relationships between mutations and protein function enables more precise hypothesis generation and facilitates experimental validation. Subsequently, the review presents generic AI-enabled protein engineering strategies and pipelines, including rational, semi-rational, refactoring, and de novo design, tailored to diverse protein engineering objectives. These approaches aim to create artificial variants and synthetic proteins with improved or novel functions to foster innovation in crop breeding. Finally, the significant challenges of applying protein design in plants are discussed, particularly in light of the limited availability of experimentally resolved protein structures and the inherent complexity of plant biological systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.