ArticleBMC health services research2026
Workforce and system implications of unprofessional behavior: a nationwide mixed-methods study in Thai emergency medicine.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical councils and associations frequently stress the importance of professionalism, yet unprofessional behaviors remain common. Such behaviors can compromise patient safety, especially in emergency departments, which face diverse conditions, heavy workloads, and demanding team interactions. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the incidence, pattern, and factors associated with unprofessional behavior experienced by emergency physicians in a developing country.
methodsIn this convergent parallel mixed-methods study, a nationwide online survey of emergency physicians and residents was conducted alongside in-depth interviews with residents and specialists from emergency medicine and other specialties between November 5 and December 5, 2024.
resultsAmong 262 respondents (response rate: 40.3%), the majority were board-certified physicians (71.4%), were female (58.8%), and had 1-10 years of experience (81.7%). Approximately 90.8% of participants reported experiencing unprofessional behavior in the emergency departments during the past year. In particular, verbal aggression (85.9%) had the highest frequency, followed by online misconduct (33.6%) and physical aggression (7.6%). Younger physicians (< 35 years of age), those with 1-10 years of experience, and those who were dissatisfied with their income were more likely to encounter such behavior than others. Most incidents of unprofessional behavior occurred during consultations or patient handovers, with surgery and internal medicine specialists most commonly identified as perpetrators. Although most hospitals had reporting systems, less than half of the incidents were reported, mainly because of low perceived severity and lack of effective resolution. The reported consequences included reduced job satisfaction (67.2%), decreased professional confidence (46.2%), and negative effects on patient safety and outcomes (27.3%), including compromised clinical decision-making. The qualitative findings revealed that unprofessional behavior is often normalized in emergency departments, driven by high workload and inadequate communication. Concerns regarding clinical competency among emergency physicians and residents also emerged as a contributing factor.
conclusionsUnprofessional behavior is widespread in Thai emergency medicine, which disproportionately affects younger physicians and undermines provider well-being and patient care. The results highlight not only individual challenges but also systemic gaps within the healthcare system. Thus, urgent, multilevel strategies are needed to address this issue and improve patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.