Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851896›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Regulation and criminal law enforcement in healthcare: an uneasy alliance or partners in crime?

Quirine Amelink, Jan-Willem Weenink, Ian Leistikow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Quirine AmelinkErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam, 3062PA, The Netherlands. amelink@eshpm.eur.nl.
Jan-Willem WeeninkErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam, 3062PA, The Netherlands.
Ian LeistikowErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam, 3062PA, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reports on research on the collaboration between the regulator and criminal law enforcement in the healthcare sector. Based on observations of consultations between the regulator and criminal law enforcement in The Netherlands, two underlying factors are distinguished that create challenges in this collaboration: practical issues and ideological differences. The divergent ideologies and values between regulation and criminal law enforcement hinder an integrated approach to incidents in healthcare. We argue that articulating and valuing these ideological differences would create an opportunity for mutual disciplinary enrichment. An interdisciplinary approach to incidents in healthcare could mitigate the inherent biases of both actors and thus provide otherwise unseen opportunities to prevent similar future incidents. By doing so, the regulator and criminal law enforcement could work towards a form of collaboration regarding incidents in healthcare that does justice to the interests of both the patients, the healthcare sector and society.

Indexed as

CrimeCriminal LawLaw EnforcementCooperative BehaviorHumansNetherlandsPatient SafetyCollaborationCriminal law enforcementHealthcareInterdisciplinarityPatient safetyRegulation

Identifiers

PMID41851896
PMCPMC13112815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.