ArticleBMC public health2026
Social connection before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: results of the Belgian Health Interview Survey.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic required major preventive measures that had a substantial impact on social life. Since then, there has been concern for pandemic side-effects on social connection. While short-term increases in poor social connection have been observed during the pandemic, less is known about long-term consequences. Only a few studies have made comparisons of social connection before, during and after the pandemic, showing conflicting results. Some observed lasting decreases in social connection, while others observed recovery.
methodsThe current study aimed to assess changes in social connection, by comparing pre- and post-pandemic levels of social contact frequency, social support (measured with the Oslo Social Support Scale) and social satisfaction. Logistic regression was performed using cross-sectional data from the Belgian Health Interview Surveys, with a pre-pandemic measurement in 2018 (N = 8075) and a post-pandemic measurement in 2023–2024 (N = 4926) in the general Belgian population aged 15 years or older, and in separate sociodemographic subgroups.
resultsIn the general population, there were no differences in social connection between the pre- and post-pandemic waves. However, stratified analyses showed lower post-pandemic social satisfaction in those with tertiary education and those living alone as compared to pre-pandemic levels. In addition, in 15 to 24 year-olds, the odds of poor social support were higher after the pandemic, as compared to before. Our findings argue for particular attention for the social connection of adolescents and young adults, and those living alone, both in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, and in anticipation of future pandemics. Additional research is needed to understand the post-pandemic drop in social satisfaction prevalence in those with tertiary education.
conclusionsTaken together, this study contributes to longer-term insights on social connection in the context of COVID-19 pandemic, preparedness for future pandemics and particular points of concern for social connection in general.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.