ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Lessons Learned From the Implementation of a Clinic-Focused HPV Vaccination Initiative.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStrengthening provider recommendation is an effective strategy in increasing the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake. A quality improvement (QI) initiative called "Communicating about HPV to Adults and Teens" (HPV CHAT) was initiated to support providers with communication tools to discuss HPV vaccination with parents and patients. We described lessons learned for implementation of a clinic-based provider training for HPV vaccination.
methodsHPV CHAT was implemented in safety-net hospital clinics, practice-based research clinics, and federally qualified health centers between September 2021 and August 2023. Guided by the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model, we retrospectively evaluated process improvements across 2 implementation cycles.
resultsOverall, 318 providers participated across the 2 cycles. Key activities in the first cycle included identification of clinic needs, development of asynchronous virtual training, advisory board feedback, recruitment communications via practice and clinic managers, and provider participation monitoring. Barriers included slow response to participation (58.3% response rate) and high turnover rate in some clinics. Results from the first cycle informed activities implemented in the second cycle. In the second cycle, participation rate was 60.6% and varied across settings due to strength of clinic collaborations and prior knowledge of the implementation process.
conclusionsThe success of HPV CHAT underscores the need to proactively tailor interventions for clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.