ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Multimodal deep learning improves cross-environment prediction of durum wheat yield components.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Durum wheat breeding increasingly requires tools that can anticipate how genotypes respond to the shifting mix of heat and drought typical of Mediterranean drylands. In this study, we explored whether a multimodal deep learning (MM-DL) framework-one that brings together genomic markers, environmental covariates (ECs), near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and phenology-can improve predictions for five key yield-related traits: grain number per spike (GN), grain weight per spike (GW), number of spikelets per spike (NS), spike length (SL), and spike weight (SW). The evaluation relied on multi-environment data from three contrasting seasons, using two scenarios with direct relevance for breeding: predicting an entirely unseen season (Prediction of Year, PoY) and predicting new sowing environments within the same season (Prediction of Sowing Year, PoSY). Across all traits, integrating multiple data sources improved prediction accuracy relative to genomics alone, with gains varying according to the physiological basis of each trait. SL was consistently the easiest trait to predict (PoY ≈ 0.56-0.71; PoSY ≈ 0.74-0.80), followed by NS (PoY ≈ 0.23-0.47; PoSY ≈ 0.56-0.67). GW showed moderate and dependable accuracy (PoY ≈ 0.24-0.30; PoSY ≈ 0.34-0.46), while SW yielded intermediate values (PoY ≈ 0.27-0.38; PoSY ≈ 0.34-0.41). GN remained the most environmentally sensitive trait, with modest accuracy under PoY (0.28-0.32) and clearer gains within PoSY (0.43-0.53). ECs contributed most to improving cross-season transferability, whereas NIRS and phenology added smaller but still useful trait-specific signals. Overall, the results show that combining genomics with enviromics and phenomics produces more stable and biologically informed predictions. For durum wheat breeding under increasing climate variability, MM-DL offers a practical path toward more reliable selection decisions across seasons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.