Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851773›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026

Non-invasive assessment of PD-L1 status and histology in non-small cell lung cancer using

Bartłomiej Tomasik, Marcin Jąkalski, Michał Bieńkowski, Jacek Teodorczyk, Bartosz Kamil Sobocki, Konrad Stawiski, Jacek Burzynski, Grzegorz Romanowicz, Rafał Dziadziuszko, Wojciech Cytawa and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Prognostic Role ofCancers · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bartłomiej Tomasik *Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Marcin Jąkalski *3P-Medicine Laboratory, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Michał BieńkowskiDepartment of Pathomorphology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Jacek TeodorczykDepartment of Pathomorphology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Bartosz Kamil SobockiDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Konrad StawiskiDepartment of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Jacek BurzynskiDepartment of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Grzegorz RomanowiczDepartment of Pathomorphology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Rafał DziadziuszkoDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Wojciech CytawaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland. wcytawa@gumed.edu.pl.
Jakub Mieczkowski3P-Medicine Laboratory, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland. jakubm@gumed.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-2091-012X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiomics analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT enables extraction of high-dimensional quantitative features that may serve as imaging biomarkers for tumor biology. In particular, in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), such features could potentially predict immune checkpoint biomarker status, such as PD-L1 expression, and histological subtype without the need for invasive tissue sampling.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed pre-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT scans of 115 patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC (adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma) and known PD-L1 status. Radiomic features were extracted from primary tumors and combined with basic clinical variables (“naïve features”). Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering were performed to assess separability between the selected classes representing either PD-L1 subtype or histology. Multiple machine learning classifiers, including random forest (RF), were trained using radiomic-only, naïve-only, and combined feature sets. Model performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).

resultsFor PD-L1 prediction, the RF model trained on radiomic features achieved the highest accuracy (AUC-ROC = 0.83, 95% CI = [0.75 - 0.91]), outperforming the combined feature model (AUC-ROC = 0.81, 95% CI = [0.73 - 0.89]) and naïve-only generalized linear and RF models (AUC-ROC ~ 0.5). Heatmap analysis of selected radiomic features showed significant clustering of PD-L1-positive and -negative tumors (Fisher’s exact p = 7 × 10− 4). For histological subtype classification, the best-performing RF model achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.76 using radiomic features. Although PCA demonstrated partial separation between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (PC1 = 38%, PC2 = 21%), the hierarchical clustering led to the significant class separation (p = 0.0234).

conclusionsOur pilot project indicated that 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics enables accurate non-invasive prediction of PD-L1 expression and provides moderate discrimination between major NSCLC histological subtypes. Clinical variables alone have negligible predictive value for PD-L1 status. Radiomic models may complement histopathology, particularly when tissue sampling is limited or repeated biomarker assessment is required. Prospective, multi-center validation is needed to confirm generalizability and facilitate clinical translation.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFluorodeoxyglucose F18Lung NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiomicsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrincipal Component AnalysisRandom ForestROC CurveB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanFluorodeoxyglucose F1818F-FDG PET/CTHistologyMachine learningNon-small cell lung cancerPD-L1Radiomics

Identifiers

PMID41851773
PMCPMC13112830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.