ReviewParasites & vectors2026
Current issues in heartworm chemotherapy.
Review in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several issues that affect prevention and treatment of heartworm infections require more intensive research. The incidence of heartworm infection in the USA is increasing, but the factors that underlie this trend remain incompletely understood. The contributions of climate change, vector range expansion, client compliance and resistance to macrocyclic lactones (ML) are likely interrelated and require investigation. Molecular-level research has not yet identified the causative mechanisms underlying ML resistance (MLR), but surveys of genomic markers associated with the trait reveal worrying trends in the presence and frequency of these resistance alleles. Research is needed to confirm the phenotypic relevance of these markers and to identify the gene(s) responsible for it. Developing highly inbred strains of MLR heartworms may be necessary but would require multigenerational studies of targeted breeding of selected parasites in dogs. A second issue of concern for veterinarians is the increasing extra-label use of emodepside products for the treatment of multiple anthelmintic drug resistant (MADR) canine hookworms (Ancylostoma caninum), which are already common throughout the USA. Emodepside is not approved for use in dogs in the USA, but a cat topical product containing the drug is, and is being used orally in hookworm-infected dogs. Emodepside has activity against larval and adult stages of many filarial parasites and the safety of this drug in heartworm-infected dogs has not been reported. It is perhaps unlikely that such studies will be undertaken, given the lack of economic motivation. Nonetheless, a review of the relevant literature leads to the conclusion that the status of heartworm infection in a dog bearing an apparently MADR hookworm infection be determined before starting treatment with emodepside, with caution exercised should it ensue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.