ArticleRespiratory research2026
Single-cell mitophagy signature-based artificial intelligence model enhances prediction of prognosis and immunotherapy response in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Article in Respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNon-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) exhibits pronounced molecular heterogeneity, and current predictive models rarely incorporate mitochondrial quality-control programs such as mitophagy. We hypothesize that an artificial intelligence model based on mitophagy-related genes (MRGs) at single-cell resolution could improve prediction of survival and immunotherapy benefit.
methodsWe analyzed single-cell RNA sequencing data from treatment-naïve NSCLC tumors to evaluate the activity of MRGs and identify genes exhibiting differential expression between cells with high versus low mitophagy levels. These differentially expressed genes were then cross-referenced with mitophagy gene sets to pinpoint candidate prognostic markers. Using LASSO regression combined with multiple machine learning classifiers, we constructed a risk model, which was validated in both internal and external cohorts, including a clinical immunotherapy trial. We further examined the relationship between the risk model, immune cell infiltration, and drug sensitivity in silico. The key MRGs were then experimentally validated in A549 cells using qRT-PCR, Western blotting, immunofluorescence, and functional assays for cell migration and wound healing.
resultsWe quantified the mitochondrial autophagy activity of 18,167 single cells. Differential expression yielded 1,668 genes; intersection with the MRG list produced 39 candidates. A six-gene panel (FOS, CANX, EIF4G1, CALCOCO2, HSP90AB1, and PRKAR1A) emerged from LASSO. Gradient boosting machine (GBM) achieved the optimal cross-validated performance (testing set: AUC = 0.80, validation set: AUC = 0.72). SHAP analysis ranked PRKAR1A and CALCOCO2 as the top risk contributors. Patients classified into the high-MRG-score group exhibited consistently shorter overall survival (OS) across all datasets (HR = 3.66, 95% CI 1.72 − 7.81, P < 0.001). Low-MRG tumors displayed elevated immune and ESTIMATE scores with reduced tumor purity, and achieved a significantly higher objective response rate (35% vs 22%, P < 0.05) and prolonged OS (HR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.07 − 2.05, P = 0.017) with immune checkpoint blockade in the clinical-trial setting. Experimental results showed that knockdown of CALCOCO2 or overexpression of PRKAR1A significantly inhibited A549 cell proliferation and reduced mitochondrial membrane potential (P < 0.05), thereby affecting mitophagy.
conclusionWe developed an MRG-based model that reliably stratifies NSCLC patients according to prognosis and identifies those most likely to respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors, providing a framework for integrating tumor metabolic characteristics into personalized therapeutic decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.