ArticleBMC oral health2026
Color matching and metameric behavior of composite resins applied on anodized titanium surfaces: an in vitro spectrophotometric study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the color matching and metameric behavior of two different composite resins applied to titanium surfaces anodized to yellow and pink colors. The study aimed to determine the effects of anodization color and composite resin type on color performance in hybrid prosthesis and screw access hole closure applications. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 72 Grade 5 titanium discs (10 mm diameter × 2 mm thickness) were allocated to three anodization conditions: nonanodized/gray (0 V, n = 24), yellow (55 V, n = 24), and pink (80 V, n = 24). Each anodization group was subdivided into two subgroups: 3 M Filtek Z250 (microhybrid) and Tokuyama Estelite Sigma Quick (supra-nano hybrid) composite resins (A2 shade, 2 mm thickness; n = 12 per subgroup). Gray titanium + composite specimens were used as the reference for ΔE₀₀ calculations; yellow and pink anodization groups constituted the experimental groups. Color measurements were performed using a spectrophotometer (Konica Minolta CM-3700 A) under four light sources (D65, D50, incandescent A, and F11). Data were analyzed using mixed-design repeated-measures ANOVA, Bonferroni post hoc test, and independent samples t-test (α = 0.05).
resultsAnodization color (η² = 0.941) and composite type (η² = 0.952) demonstrated strong effects on ΔE₀₀ values (both p < 0.001). Light source showed statistically significant but clinically negligible effect (η² = 0.521, mean difference < 0.1 ΔE₀₀). Pink anodization exhibited higher color differences than yellow (2.84–2.99 vs. 1.53–1.62), and Tokuyama composite higher than 3 M (2.89–3.12 vs. 1.41–1.54) (both p < 0.001). Yellow+3 M combination showed lowest values (0.91–0.97), while Pink+Tokuyama showed highest (3.68–3.97). Metamerism index remained minimal (MI < 0.21).
conclusionsCareful material selection is essential for optimal esthetics in anodized titanium-composite systems. Yellow anodization combined with a microhybrid composite demonstrated the most favorable color matching performance under the tested conditions. for hybrid prostheses, screw-retained restorations, and esthetic implant applications.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.