Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851717›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2026

Recognising dog movement with behaviour-specific machine learning models: bout length as a biologically relevant parameter for window size.

Gábor Csizmadia, Bálint Daróczy, Bence Ferdinandy, Balázs Nagy, Ádám Miklósi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gábor CsizmadiaDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Lóránd University, Budapest, Hungary. csizmadia.gabor.tamas@ttk.elte.hu.
Bálint DaróczyAI Laboratory, Institute for Computer Science and Control, HUN-REN SZTAKI, Budapest, Hungary.
Bence FerdinandyDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Lóránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Balázs NagyMTA-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.
Ádám MiklósiDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Lóránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning methods are widely used to detect behavioural data patterns. Although these new mathematical methods are useful tools, the interpretation of the results are often ambivalent unless biologically relevant parameters are included in the analyses. In case of classical (non-neural) machine learning (ML) methods, a crucial first step in time series data analysis is to determine the window length for which the features are computed as input variables for the ML training phase. The bout length of behaviours could be a relevant parameter to determine the window length used by the machine learning methods.

methodsIn this research the movements of dogs were observed. Eight behaviours were defined and motion data was collected using a smartwatch attached to the collar of the dogs. The behaviour sequences of 56 freely moving dogs of various breeds were analysed by using a specific software (SensDog by CEM Inc.). Behaviour recognition was based on binary classification evaluated with a Light Gradient Boosted Machine (LGBM) learning algorithm. For signal processing, sliding window technique was used to find the best window size for the analysis of each behavior.

resultsResults showed that for all behaviours, the best recognition was obtained when the window size corresponded to the median bout length of that particular behaviour.

conclusionsIn summary, the most effective strategy to significantly improve the accuracy of behaviour recognition is to use behaviour-specific parameters in the binary classification models.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalMachine LearningAnimalsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsDogsMovementPredictive Learning ModelsBehaviour recognitionBout lengthLGBMMachine learningOne-vs-AllSupervised learningWindow size

Identifiers

PMID41851717
PMCPMC13123084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.