Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851703›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2026

Prevention and postvention guidance relating to self-harm and suicide for UK educational and youth organisations: a systematic review of grey literature.

Emily Widnall, Hannah Robinson, Lingyi Wang, Gregory Hartwell, Rowan Streckfuss Davis, Frances Mathews, Faraz Mughal, Liam Spencer, Sally O'Keeffe, Abigail Russell and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Emily WidnallPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Canynge Hall, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK. emily.widnall@bristol.ac.uk.
Hannah RobinsonPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Canynge Hall, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK.
Lingyi WangPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Canynge Hall, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK.
Gregory HartwellLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Rowan Streckfuss DavisUniversity of Exeter, Exete, UK.
Frances MathewsUniversity of Exeter, Exete, UK.
Faraz MughalOxford Primary Care Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Liam SpencerNewcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Sally O'KeeffeNewcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Abigail RussellUniversity of Exeter, Exete, UK.
Lucy BiddlePopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Canynge Hall, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK.
Judi KidgerPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Canynge Hall, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK.

Funding

School for Public Health Research NIHR 204000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSelf-harm and suicide among young people are major public health concerns and delivering prevention and postvention support is crucial. Educational and youth organisations play a vital role in both prevention and postvention. However, evidence shows a lack of understanding of effective interventions, and limited awareness of the available guidance in this area. We reviewed current self-harm and suicide guidance available to education and youth organisations in the UK that support young people and identified gaps in this provision.

methodsA systematic grey literature review was conducted between July and August 2023 using the following methods: internet searches (Google and OpenGrey), advice from experts and reference list checks. To be included, guidance had to focus on supporting children and young people aged 11–18 years and be intended for use in education or youth organisation settings in the UK. Guidance also had to include information on self-harm and/or suicide prevention or postvention and be freely and publicly available. A narrative review and content analysis of all included guidance was conducted. Gaps in existing guidance were identified from the content analysis, through consultation with young people and adult advisory group members and comparison with relevant literature. A formal quality appraisal was not undertaken due to a lack of validated frameworks to assess grey literature.

resultsTwo hundred ninety-seven guidance resources were screened; 104 met the inclusion criteria. Regarding prevention guidance, 36 focused on self-harm, 4 on suicide and 21 covered both. By comparison, 29 covered postvention and 14 covered both prevention and postvention (8 were suicide only and six were self-harm and suicide). Notably, there was a marked imbalance in target settings, with over half of the guidance (54/104) focused on educational settings compared with only 5 resources specifically tailored to youth organisations, highlighting a substantial gap in guidance for non-education settings. Three key categories of content were identified: psychoeducation/information, recommended response and resources. Within these, 20 subcategories were identified: definitions and signposting were the most frequently included. The stakeholder-informed gap analysis revealed a lack of support for parents/carers, practical resources for professionals to use and tailored information for specific populations (e.g. neurodiverse, LGBTQIA+). Although 104 relevant guidance resources were available, it was difficult to assess the quality of the guidance as there was a lack of information on how individual guidance resources were developed and whether the content was evidence-based.

conclusionKey recommendations for future guidance include more guidance for youth organisations, more on response and support after a suicide, more tailored guidance for vulnerable groups and more guidance for how organisations can support parents and carers. Additionally, guidance should be co-produced to ensure that key topics identified as important to stakeholders are not missed.

Indexed as

Self-Injurious BehaviorSuicideAdolescentChildFemaleHumansIncidenceInternetMalePractice Guidelines as TopicPrevalencePsychological Well-BeingRisk FactorsSchoolsSocial MediaUnited KingdomEducationGuidanceSchoolsSelf-harmSuicide preventionSystematic reviewYouth organisations

Identifiers

PMID41851703
PMCPMC13112647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.