Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851684›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Utilization of routine health information system and its determinants among healthcare professionals in public health facilities of Banadir region, Somalia: A cross-sectional study.

Nor Haji Osman, Abdiweli Mohamed Abdi, Mohamed Abdelrahman Mohamed, Nur Rashid Ahmed, Osman Abubakar Fiidow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nor Haji OsmanCenter for Graduate Studies, Department of Statistics and Data Analytics, Jamhuriya University of Science & Technology (JUST), Mogadishu, Somalia.
Abdiweli Mohamed AbdiCenter for Graduate Studies, Department of Statistics and Data Analytics, Jamhuriya University of Science & Technology (JUST), Mogadishu, Somalia.
Mohamed Abdelrahman MohamedDepartment of public health research, National Institute of Health, Mogadishu, Somalia.
Nur Rashid AhmedAdvanced Medical Research Center, Jamhuriya University of Science & Technology (JUST), Mogadishu, Somalia.
Osman Abubakar FiidowDepartment of public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Salaam University, Mogadishu, Somalia. fiidowosman@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth Information Systems (HIS) are vital for the collection, storage, analysis, and dissemination of health data to support effective decision-making and resource management at all levels of healthcare. However, despite their importance, many healthcare professionals do not effectively use routine health information, leading to missed opportunities for data-driven decisions and weakened health system performance. This study aimed to assess the utilization of routine health information and its determinants among healthcare professionals in public health facilities in the Banadir Region, Somalia.

methodsA facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March to June 2024 across 32 public health facilities in the Banadir Region, Somalia. A total of 405 healthcare professionals were selected using a two-stage cluster sampling technique. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaires and observational checklists developed based on the PRISM framework. The questionnaire included items assessing factors influencing RHIS use, such as the availability of training, standardization of indicators, level of supervision, and attitudes toward data utilization. Data were entered and cleaned in Excel and analyzed using SPSS version 27. Bivariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed, with variables showing p < 0.05 in the multivariate analysis considered statistically significant.

resultsIn this study, 68.1% of healthcare professionals demonstrated good RHIS utilization (95% CI: 63.5%–72.6%). Multivariable analysis showed that professionals working in hospitals were less likely to utilize health information than those in health centers (AOR = 0.273, 95% CI: 0.144–0.519). Lack of HIS training (AOR = 0.061, 95% CI: 0.030–0.125), non-standardized indicators (AOR = 0.188, 95% CI: 0.047–0.745), and lack of supervision (AOR = 0.195, 95% CI: 0.098–0.386) were associated with lower utilization. Additionally, untrained professionals in data analysis were less likely to use health information effectively (AOR = 0.165, 95% CI: 0.029–0.926). Health professionals with a positive attitude toward data utilization were 2.8 times more likely to use health data (AOR = 2.861, 95% CI: 1.155–7.090).

conclusionThe study found that 68.1% of healthcare professionals demonstrated good RHIS utilization. Key barriers included inadequate training, insufficient supervision, non-standardized indicators, and limited data analysis skills. Strengthening in-service training, improving supervision and feedback mechanisms, enhancing access to digital tools, and standardizing indicators are recommended to improve RHIS utilization and foster evidence-based decision-making in the Banadir Region.

Indexed as

Health Information SystemsHealth PersonnelAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSomaliaSurveys and QuestionnairesBanadir regionHealthcare professionalsInformation utilizationSomalia

Identifiers

PMID41851684
PMCPMC13112844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.