ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Tislelizumab-induced Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-like uveitis: a case report.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-like Disease Complicated by Inflammatory Macular Neovascularisation: A Case Report and Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile immune checkpoint inhibitors like the anti-PD-1 agent tislelizumab have revolutionized the treatment of cancer, they pose a risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH)-like uveitis is a rare, vision-threatening ocular irAE that poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, often mimicking its idiopathic counterpart. CASE PRESENTATION: Following ten cycles of adjuvant tislelizumab treatment, a 52-year-old female with a past medical history of esophageal cancer presented with acute monocular vision loss. Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation revealed left optic disc edema, exudative retinal detachment, and characteristic serous retinal detachments on optical coherence tomography (OCT). Extensive systemic workup excluded infectious, neoplastic, and primary autoimmune etiologies. Notably, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis revealed a lymphocyte-dominant profile but no pleocytosis, a finding atypical for classic VKH disease. The uveitis responded markedly to systemic corticosteroid pulse therapy but flared unequivocally upon two subsequent tislelizumab infusions, establishing a clear drug-effect temporal relationship. After completing the planned 12 cycles of tislelizumab alongside a prolonged, carefully tapered oral corticosteroid regimen, the patient's ocular inflammation resolved completely. At one-year follow-up, visual acuity remained stable with no recurrence, demonstrating sustained remission after cessation of the inciting agent.
conclusionThis case strongly implicates tislelizumab as a trigger for VKH-like uveitis and highlights two critical learning points: the potential lack of CSF pleocytosis as a differentiating feature from primary VKH, and the risk of recurrence upon drug rechallenge. It underscores the necessity for close collaboration between oncologists and ophthalmologists to navigate the dual imperatives of cancer control and vision preservation. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.