ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Accuracy of Mansoura Early Feeding Skills Assessment score (MEFSA) in identification of oral feeding readiness in preterm infants.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral feeding readiness is a complex concept. More evidence is needed to approach the initiation of oral feedings in preterm infants. Recognition and support of oral feeding readiness may decrease hospital stays and reduce healthcare costs. PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of the pre-feeding section of the Mansoura Early Feeding Skills Assessment (MEFSA) score on the initiation of oral feeding in preterm infants and identify a cutoff point for oral feeding readiness concerning the oral feeding skill (OFS) level. Furthermore, to confirm the concordance between the MEFSA and the OFS level.
methodsTransversal and analytical study of 41 preterm infants. Infants were assessed before the first oral feeding by the pre-feeding section. Furthermore, the first oral feeding act is evaluated by the during-feeding section of MEFSA and OFS level. The cutoff point was estimated based on the OFS level and success using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Pearson correlations were obtained between the pre-feeding and during-feeding sections, as well as the association between the during-feeding section and OFS score.
resultsMEFSA’s overall diagnostic accuracy was 82.5%. Cutoff points for oral feeding readiness were determined to be greater than 77 and greater than 77.5, concerning OFS level and oral feeding success, respectively. A moderate positive correlation coefficient existed between the pre-feeding and during-feeding sections of MEFSA.
conclusionThe pre-feeding section of MEFSA is a straightforward, quick instrument that can be used in clinical practice. It has a moderate to high accuracy in pinpointing the ideal time for readiness for oral feeding. However, more research is needed. We suggest combining the pre-feeding and during-feeding sections in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.