ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Deep learning-based seed germination prediction using morphological traits and RGB images.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seed selection constitutes the initial and one of the most critical steps in agricultural productivity. The identification of high-quality seeds is a labor-intensive and costly process that requires considerable expertise. Within the scope of smart farming applications, this study proposes a deep learning–based model designed to automate the seed selection process by accurately predicting seed germination capacity from seed images. The proposed model determines whether a seed will germinate using RGB images and morphological traits automatically extracted from these images. The dataset used in this study comprises a total of 3,645 images belonging to three different seed types. For each seed type (okra, eggplant, and tomato), 405 seed images were acquired from three distinct imaging sources (digital microscope, camera, and scanner), labeled, and subsequently sown in seed trays. The germination status of each sown seed was systematically monitored and matched with its corresponding image data. The dataset was partitioned into 80% training and 20% testing subsets. Following 5-fold stratified cross-validation, the proposed model achieved an average weighted F1-score of 0.95 on the training set and 0.93 on the testing set for germination capacity prediction. The performance of the proposed model was further compared with widely used deep convolutional neural network architectures, including VGG19, ResNet50, and EfficientNetB5. Comparative results demonstrate that the proposed model provides competitive and robust performance for seed germination prediction. Overall, the findings indicate that the proposed approach can effectively be utilized for automated seed germination prediction. Future research should evaluate the generalizability of the model by conducting performance assessments on additional seed types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.