Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851594›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026

Generative modelling of continuous feature foraging reveals probabilistic representations of target distributions.

Jennifer C Magerl Fuller, Árni Kristjánsson, Alasdair Clarke, Árni Gunnar Ásgeirsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer C Magerl FullerFaculty of Psychology, Nýi Garður, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland. jcm3@hi.is.
Árni KristjánssonFaculty of Psychology, Nýi Garður, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Alasdair ClarkeFaculty of Psychology, University of Essex, 2.719 Colchester Campus, Colchester, UK.
Árni Gunnar ÁsgeirssonFaculty of Psychology, University of Akureyri, Akureyri, Iceland.

Funding

Raunvísindastofnun, Háskóli Íslands 228366-051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To successfully orient ourselves within noisy visual environments, we must focus our attention on items of importance, ignoring sources of distraction. This selective attending is typically thought to be facilitated by templates, tuned towards current goals. However, in real-world scenes, the appearance of objects, such as their colour or luminance, varies greatly due to perceptual interpretation and environmental factors. Therefore, tuning attentional templates probabilistically may be more efficient than tuning them to precise values. This seems particularly important during continuous tasks, that require the selection of multiple objects which share certain properties. We investigated the effects of variability in target identity, using a novel foraging task. Participants (N = 15) had to continuously select 30 target objects, drawn from a truncated Gaussian colour distribution, sampled from a linearized space of 48 isoluminant hues. We adapted a generative model and applied it to the data, within a Bayesian multilevel framework. The model characterizes foraging as a sampling process without replacement and allows us to break foraging down into behavioural patterns that influence individual's target selection, independent of the number of targets present. The modelling results demonstrate increased likelihood of selection of more probable colour values in the scene. This likelihood maps onto the underlying probability distribution, illustrating how observers can acquire knowledge of the distribution's properties through foraging, beyond just the summary statistics.

Indexed as

AttentionColor PerceptionOrientationPattern Recognition, VisualAdultBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBayesian modellingFeature distribution learningVisual attentionVisual perception

Identifiers

PMID41851594
PMCPMC12999875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.