Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851593›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

Return-to-Play Criteria Following Lower Limb Muscle Injuries in Soccer: A Systematic Review with Evidence Synthesis.

Javier Pecci, Nicol van Dyk, Gregory D Myer, Borja Sañudo

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Javier PecciDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, University of Seville, Seville, Spain. jpecci@us.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2842-3067
Nicol van DykSection Sports Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0724-5997
Gregory D MyerSports Performance And Research Center (SPARC), Emory University School of Medicine, Flowery Branch, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9983-8422
Borja SañudoDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9969-9573

Funding

Ministerio de Universidades FPU22/01315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective was to systematically identify and categorize return-to-play (RTP) domains and criteria used following muscle injuries in male soccer players, and to describe the certainty of the evidence according to the number, design and methodological quality of the studies implementing RTP criteria within each domain.

methodsIn total, six databases were searched up to 10 March 2024. Studies reporting RTP criteria for hamstring, adductor, quadriceps, and calf injuries, as well as general criteria for all muscle injuries, were included. The certainty of evidence for RTP criteria was assessed on the basis of the studies citing each criterion.

resultsOut of 58,057 records, 135 studies met the inclusion criteria. Strength and pain criteria are the most cited tests for determining RTP clearance following hamstring injuries, particularly criteria related to between-limb knee flexors/extensors strength symmetry and no pain during soccer-specific actions. Range of motion criteria (active knee extension, passive and active straight leg raise, and Askling-H tests) and subjective readiness demonstrated the highest certainty of evidence in RTP decision making after hamstring injuries. RTP criteria following adductor injuries showed a moderate-to-very-low certainty of evidence across domains. Criteria for quadriceps and calf injuries ranged from low to very low evidence, while general lower limb muscle injury criteria had only very low evidence. Following adductor injuries, the highest evidence (moderate) was shown by pain assessments and completing at least one full team training session.

conclusionsSymmetry between limbs in knee flexor and extensor strength combined with no pain during soccer-specific actions were the most frequently implemented RTP criteria for hamstring injuries. In addition, range of motion evaluation (i.e., active knee extension, passive and active straight leg raise, and Askling-H tests) and subjective readiness assessments have been more consistently employed in higher-quality intervention studies than other domains following hamstring injuries in soccer players. Pain assessments, completing at least one full team training session and restoring strength levels are the most cited criteria for RTP following adductor injuries. The evidence base describing RTP criteria for quadriceps and calf injuries is limited and is not implemented in randomized controlled trials with high methodological quality, highlighting the need for further robust research in these domains. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42022363836.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesLeg InjuriesLower ExtremityMuscle, SkeletalReturn to SportSoccerHamstring MusclesHumansMaleMuscle StrengthRange of Motion, Articular

Identifiers

PMID41851593
PMCPMC13260053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.