ArticleInternational journal of hematology2026
Evaluation of Real-world treatment patterns in Japanese patients with cGVHD: A retrospective claims database study.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study using the medical data vision (MDV) database included adult patients who had confirmed diagnosis of cGVHD between 2003 and 2023, were prescribed a steroid prior to diagnosis of cGVHD, and received mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), ibrutinib, or ruxolitinib as second- or later-line therapy. Duration of treatment (DoT) and steroid dose reduction during second-line therapy were assessed. Of the 1489 patients whose data were retrieved, 854 were included (median [range] age: 54 [18.0-83.0] years; males: 518 [60.7%]; mean [SD] Charlson Comorbidity Index score: 7.5 [3.5]). Data on second or later lines of treatment were available for 226 patients. The most common second-line therapy used after first-line steroid treatment was MMF (110 [48.67%]), followed by ibrutinib (88 [38.94%]) and ruxolitinib (28 [12.39%]). Median DoT (days) was 95 for MMF, 86 for ibrutinib, and 30 for ruxolitinib. Steroid doses were mostly kept below 0.5 mg/kg/day under all the 3 second-line treatments. These real-world data provide valuable insights into the management of cGVHD with the therapies currently used in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.