ReviewInfection2026
Integrating machine learning and artificial intelligence in the management of Acinetobacter infections: a narrative review.
Review in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent Advances and Future Perspectives in the Detection of Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acinetobacter baumannii, particularly in its multidrug-resistant (MDR) and carbapenem-resistant (CRAB) forms, has become a major global health concern due to its ability to survive in hospital environments, acquire resistance rapidly, and cause severe infections with high mortality. Conventional diagnostic and therapeutic strategies remain slow, imprecise, and difficult to implement, especially in resource-limited settings, highlighting the need for innovative approaches. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offer powerful tools to strengthen every stage of Acinetobacter infection management. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on how AI enhances early detection, improves species-level identification, predicts antimicrobial resistance from genomic data, accelerates drug discovery, and supports real-time hospital surveillance and outbreak control. AI-driven methods enable faster triage, more accurate differentiation between colonization and true infection, robust prediction of resistance phenotypes, and efficient identification of synergistic antibiotic combinations. Moreover, AI-supported drug discovery pipelines have recently yielded novel agents such as abaucin, demonstrating the potential of computational approaches to explore new chemical spaces. Despite these promising advances, challenges persist regarding data quality, generalizability across settings, interpretability, and ethical considerations including privacy and algorithmic bias. Successful integration of AI into clinical practice will require rigorous model validation, equitable data governance, and strong collaboration between clinicians, microbiologists, and data scientists. Overall, AI represents a transformative opportunity to reduce the clinical and economic burden of Acinetobacter infections and to strengthen global antimicrobial resistance surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41851574What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.