Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851561›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

Spotlight on the past: Focusing attention on long-term memory.

Gordon D Logan, Simon D Lilburn, Jana E Ulrich, Ella E Weeks, Riley Koo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gordon D LoganDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. gordon.logan@vanderbilt.edu.
Simon D LilburnDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jana E UlrichDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Ella E WeeksDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Riley KooDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation BCS 2147017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eight experiments tested the common idea that memory retrieval is attention turned inward by adapting a perceptual attention task to short-term and long-term memory paradigms to measure the focus of attention on memory. The resulting position-cued recognition task produces a distance effect that defines the sharpness of the focus of attention on memory. In theory, the effect depends on the similarity of memory probes to the cued item and its neighbors on the list and not the memory store that holds the list. The experiments asked whether the focused-attention distance effect would be observed in both long-term and short-term memory paradigms. Experiments 1-3 defined long-term memory operationally as "that which survives distracting tasks" and found distance effects after two, four, or six distracting arithmetic problems that were similar to distance effects with no distraction. Experiments 4-6 defined long-term memory operationally as "that which was trained" and found distance effects after 0, 10, and 20 pre-training trials that were similar to distance effects with novel items. Experiments 7 and 8 defined long-term memory operationally as "that which contains pre-experimental knowledge," and found distance effects when subjects recognized probe letters in spoken words and in the names of pictures they identified. The results support the hypothesis that retrieval from short-term and long-term memory both require attention turned inward. They support the hypothesis that attentional selection, turned inward or outward, depends more on the similarity structure of the list and the probe than the memory store that holds the list.

Indexed as

AttentionMemory, Long-TermMemory, Short-TermMental RecallPattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyAdultHumansYoung AdultAttention to memoryFocused attentionMemory retrievalSerial memory

Identifiers

PMID41851561
PMCPMC13461952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.