Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851560›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ageing2026

Age differences in pro-environmental behaviors: Is it about me or future generations?

Zhixuan Lin, Helene H Fung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhixuan LinDepartment of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5898-8918
Helene H FungDepartment of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China. hhlfung@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1310-8750

Funding

University Grants Council of Hong Kong Research Impact Fund (RIF) R4046-18F
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With climate change and population aging, it has become important to motivate older adults to engage in pro-environmental behaviors. Compared with younger adults, older adults may have lower ecological risk perceptions (perceived personal harm and worry) and higher social generativity (concern for future generations). The former may make them less likely, while the latter may make them more likely, to engage in pro-environmental behaviors. This study examined age-related pro-environmental behaviors when these two factors worked together. A survey was conducted among 235 older (Mage = 70.64, age range 64-93) and 238 younger adults (Mage = 25.91, age range 19-37) in Hong Kong, a subtropical city facing increasing temperatures. Despite no significant age differences in ecological risk perceptions, older adults reported greater recycling, political support, consumption-related pro-environmental behaviors, and higher social generativity compared to younger adults. Younger adults exhibited the same level of pro-environmental behaviors as older adults did at higher levels of social generativity. When asked why they engaged in pro-environmental behaviors, older adults reported more pro-environmental, habitual, and norm-conforming reasons, while younger adults reported more monetary reasons. These findings suggest that although older adults do not perceive higher ecological risks, they may engage in more pro-environmental actions for the sake of future generations. Implications for future studies and practices were discussed.

Indexed as

Age differencesPro-environmental behaviorsRisk perceptionsSelf-transcendenceSocial generativitySocioemotional selectivity theory

Identifiers

PMID41851560
PMCPMC13121656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.