ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026
Advancing Platform Trials in Early Oncology by Using MATS and EXNEX in Randomized Controlled Trials.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is widely regarded as the gold standard in clinical development due to its ability to support robust statistical inference. In early-phase oncology development, however, trialists and statisticians may face obstacles such as small patient populations, which hinder the inclusion of a randomized control arm due to recruitment challenge and timeline urgency in drug development for these small populations. The issue is further exacerbated when drug development targets multiple similar but distinct patient populations, and meanwhile concurrent patients have prognoses that differ from those in previous trials within each patient population, upon which key design assumptions are based. Moreover, FDA's Project Optimus puts more emphasis to earlier dose optimization and the optimal dose may differ across treatment regimens and patient populations. To address this, we developed a platform trial design to support proof-of-concept (POC) decision-making in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) setting and dose optimization in alignment with FDA's Project Optimus. The method builds on the Multi-Arm Two-Stage (MATS) design (Jiang in Contemp Clin Trials 132:107278, 2023) by incorporating randomized control arms and inherits its feature of stopping futile drugs at the end of Stage 1, prior to further dose optimization in Stage 2. All are conducted within an RCT setting to enhance the robustness of decision making. To further utilize the patient resource in these small populations, we enable control borrowing across cohorts using the exchangeability-nonexchangeability (EXNEX) framework (Neuenschwander et al in Pharm Stat 15 (2):123-134, 2016), thereby improving statistical efficiency-an especially important consideration that the standard of care in these small populations may deliver similar efficacy outcome. We demonstrated how our method can promote efficient early oncology development in these small and similar patient populations through a case study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41851555What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.