ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2026
Topographic sketching for surgical planning after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a non-invasive localization method.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is widely adopted as the standard treatment for locally advanced breast cancer. However, following NAC, tumors may become non-palpable due to complete or partial response, making it challenging to achieve adequate margins in breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Various tumor localization techniques have been developed to address this issue. This study compares traditional clip and wire-guided marking (Radiological Marking, RM) with a non-invasive technique called Topographic Sketching (TS).
methodsThis retrospective study included 208 patients who underwent BCS after their tumors became non-palpable post-NAC. A total of 102 patients underwent RM using radiopaque clips followed by wire-guided excision, while 106 patients were treated using the TS technique. In the TS group, pre-NAC imaging and physical examination were used to determine the tumor’s location, distance from anatomical landmarks, and skin projection. These data were documented photographically and archived. Post-NAC, the tumor site was re-evaluated, and the excision was guided by redrawn topographic markings based on both archival and current imaging data.
resultsAmong the participants, 91 patients showed complete response and 117 showed partial response to NAC. Unifocal tumors were observed in 168 patients, and multifocal tumors in 40. Only one patient from each group required a second surgery due to positive surgical margins. During a median follow-up of five years, six patients experienced local recurrence. There were no statistically significant differences between the RM and TS groups in terms of patient age, tumor stage, nodal status, multifocality, pathological response, or molecular subtype.
conclusionTopographic sketching is a promising, non-invasive, and cost-effective alternative to clip and wire-guided localization. It provides critical information about the tumor’s original borders and is comparably effective in terms of surgical outcomes and recurrence rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.