Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851519›Full record

ArticleAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2026

Comparative genomic assessment of probiotic potential across the Anoxybacillaceae family.

Mohamed Amine Gomri, Hassina Bendjaballah, Mohamed El Hadef El Okki

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamed Amine GomriInstitute of Nutrition, Food and Agri-Food Technologies (INATAA), University of Constantine 1 Frères Mentouri (UC1FM), 7th kilometre, Setif Road, 25000, Constantine, Algeria. gomrima@umc.edu.dz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0347-3412
Hassina BendjaballahInstitute of Nutrition, Food and Agri-Food Technologies (INATAA), University of Constantine 1 Frères Mentouri (UC1FM), 7th kilometre, Setif Road, 25000, Constantine, Algeria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5650-9737
Mohamed El Hadef El OkkiInstitute of Nutrition, Food and Agri-Food Technologies (INATAA), University of Constantine 1 Frères Mentouri (UC1FM), 7th kilometre, Setif Road, 25000, Constantine, Algeria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6854-1925

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thermotolerant and thermophilic bacteria have recently attracted interest as potential next-generation probiotics due to their intrinsic resistance to environmental and technological stresses. Within this context, the family Anoxybacillaceae has emerged as a promising reservoir of candidates. The aim of this study was to assess this potential through a family-level comparative genomics approach. A comparative genomic analysis was conducted on 68 bacterial genomes, including 30 clinically validated probiotic reference strains and 38 Anoxybacillaceae genomes. A curated probiotic functional marker set was assembled and calibrated. From 204 candidate markers, 101 conserved markers were retained following genome-wide screening and lineage-based filtering. Marker detection relied on a consensus-based homology framework integrating DIAMOND and HMMER, generating weighted confidence scores. Complementary analyses of biosynthetic gene clusters, carbohydrate-active enzyme-associated functions (CAZymes), genomic safety features, and mobilome components were performed.Weighted functional marker profiles significantly discriminated probiotics from Anoxybacillaceae (PERMANOVA, Bray-Curtis R

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenomicsProbioticsGenetic MarkersMultigene FamilyPhylogenyGenetic MarkersAnoxybacillaceaeBiosynthetic gene clustersComparative genomicsGenome safetyProbiotic markersProbiotics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.