ArticleScientific reports2026
Calcaneal spur detection from lateral foot radiographs using deep feature engineering.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning achieves high accuracy in medical imaging but requires large datasets. Performance decreases in small datasets. This study proposes a deep feature engineering (DFE) framework for calcaneal spur detection in X-ray images. A curated dataset of 775 X-ray images was analyzed, with 316 labeled as no finding and 459 as calcaneal spur. The framework has five phases: (i) feature extraction from 19 pretrained CNNs, (ii) feature selection with iterative neighborhood component analysis (INCA), (iii) classification with a t-algorithm-based k-nearest neighbors (tkNN) ensemble, (iv) generation of voted outcomes through iterative majority voting (IMV), and (v) final selection using a greedy algorithm. The framework achieved 93.42% accuracy. Nineteen CNN outcomes and seventeen IMV-based voted outcomes were evaluated. The greedy step selected the result with the highest accuracy. Spur detection reached higher sensitivity than no finding detection, reflecting the visual similarity between normal heels and early spur cases. The proposed DFE framework attains high accuracy on a small biomedical dataset. Its integration of CNN-based features, INCA, tkNN, IMV, and greedy selection provides a lightweight and generalizable method for medical image classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.