Trial reportScientific reports2026
The efficacy of scalp cooling in patients receiving chemotherapy for primary gynecologic cancers: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04168242 (The Psychological Impact of Scalp Cooling in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Primary Gynecologic Cancers), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Psychological Impact of Scalp Cooling in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Primary Gynecologic Cancers: a Randomised Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy of interventions for preventing chemotherapy-induced alopecia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scalp cooling can prevent chemotherapy-induced alopecia in breast cancer patients. But data in gynecologic patients were scarce. The CHARM study was a single-center randomized study. Women planning for 3-weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel were randomized to either scalp cooling or usual clinical practice in 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the efficacy in hair preservation after the completion of chemotherapy as assessed by the clinicians. Secondary endpoints included quality of life, the incidence of psychological distress, and safety. 142 women were invited to join the study but 56 refused. Finally, 44 women were randomized to the intervention group and 42 to the control group. The successful rate in preserving hair, defined as Dean score ≤ 2, upon completion of chemotherapy was significantly higher in the intervention group (29.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 12.4–46.9%) than the control group (0%, 95% CI 0–0%) (p = 0.002). Compared to the control group, the intervention group had significantly better global health status, physical functioning, and role functioning during the chemotherapy, lower incidence of psychological distress after cycle 2 of chemotherapy (27.8% vs. 62.2%, p = 0.003), and lower median PHQ-ADS scores after cycle 2 (5.5 vs. 11.0, p = 0.045) and 2–3 weeks post-chemotherapy (5.0 vs. 9.0, p = 0.033). However, the intervention group had a 30% drop-out rate despite no major adverse events. Scalp cooling could reduce the incidence of CIA and potentially alleviate psychological distress and improve the QOL in gynecologic cancer patients. Further effort is needed to improve the acceptance and compliance rates in Asian population. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04168242).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.