ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Redefining stapling in single-port thoracic surgery: initial clinical experience.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical performance of da Vinci 5 versus Xi for robotic anatomic lung resection: a propensity-weighted analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Less pain and earlier recovery after extra-thoracic single-port robotic lung resection: a propensity-matched comparison.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study is the first that reports the evolving technique and early outcomes of the new robotic stapler for the Single-port (SP) robotic platform for pulmonary robotic resection.We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. Consecutive patients undergoing single-port robotic lung resection utilizing a robotic stapler between July 2025 and February 2026.There were fifty patients (30 women), who underwent SP robotic lung resection in which the new SP stapler was used. Median age was 71 years, median height 161.3 cm, and median body mass index of 26.74. The indication for surgery was primary lung malignancy, most commonly, adenocarcinoma. Resections were lobectomy (22), segmentectomy (23) and pulmonary wedge resection (5). Median operative time was 129.5 min, with no conversions or intraoperative complications. R0 resection was achieved in all patients with a median number of 28 lymph nodes and 5 N2 and 3 N1 stations. A median of 9 successful robotic stapler firings per patient was recorded without any complications or misfiring. Median postoperative length of stay was 1 day, and median chest tube duration was 8.53 h. There was no 30- or 90-day mortality.This is the world’s first report of the new SP robotic stapler. It shows that it is safe, easy to use and is effective with no intra- or post-operative complications. These findings support the further use of the single-port platform, which features only one incision made below the chest wall that avoids all intercostal nerves, for robotic pulmonary section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41851415What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.