ArticleScientific reports2026
A method for multi-criteria decision making with probabilistic linguistic term based on cloud TOPSIS.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent literature has explored various approaches to address the stochasticity and ambiguity inherent in concept terms within the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) process. Probabilistic linguistic terms provide a robust means to represent decision makers’ assessment preferences, such as the cloud model, which can describe the relationship between ambiguity and stochasticity using numerical characteristics. To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the decision making process, it is essential to integrate both implicit uncertainty and ambiguity information, which are often present. This study develops an MCDM technique to solve decision problems in which the criterion values are expressed as probabilistic linguistic terms. First, the cloud model is introduced, along with the concept of the probabilistic linguistic cloud. A golden section technique is employed to transform probabilistic linguistic terms into probabilistic linguistic clouds. Next, a novel distance metric between probabilistic linguistic clouds is presented, and a new cloud-weighted averaging operator (PLC-WA) is proposed to aggregate multiple probabilistic linguistic clouds. Subsequently, a new probabilistic linguistic cloud-TOPSIS (PLC-TOPSIS) method is introduced, and an MCDM approach based on PLC-TOPSIS is developed. Finally, a case study on group decision making for public evacuation during nuclear accidents is presented to validate the proposed method. The feasibility of the proposed method is verified through comparative analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.