Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41851368›Full record

ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026

Wisdom, balance, and action: an ancient Anatolian perspective on leadership in ai-enabled surgery-a narrative mini-review.

Mehmet Mahir Ozmen, Rodolfo J Oviedo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehmet Mahir OzmenMOC Obesity & Cancer Center, Ankara, Turkey. ozmenmm@gmail.com.
Rodolfo J OviedoDepartment of Surgery, Nacogdoches Medical Center, Nacogdoches, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This commentary examines surgical leadership in the era of artificial intelligence and robotic surgery, emphasizing the continued primacy of human judgment, ethical responsibility, and accountability. Drawing on historical perspectives and contemporary robotic practice, we argue that sustainable progress in AI-enabled surgery depends on balancing technological augmentation with deliberate, human-centered leadership. This article is framed as a narrative mini-review, integrating recent literature with a conceptual analysis of leadership in AI-enabled and robotic surgery.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLeadershipRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansArtificial intelligence (AI)JudgmentLeadershipResponsibilityRobotic surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.