ArticleScientific reports2026
An early detection framework for young Chinese learners at risk of reading difficulty using fNIRS and deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reading difficulty (RD), a neurodevelopmental disorder affecting language acquisition in children, necessitates early screening for effective educational interventions. This study proposes the RD-risk Classifier (RDr-C), a novel framework integrating functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) with deep learning, specifically combining a dual-layer graph convolutional network (GCN), a bidirectional long short-term memory network (BiLSTM), and multi-head self-attention mechanisms (MSA) for 7-8-year-old children's literacy assessment. The model was validated using fNIRS signals from 30 participants (16 experimental group, 14 control group) during the visual sign recognition test and phonetic discrimination test, with performance evaluated through 5 runs × 5-fold cross-validation experiments. Results show that RDr-C achieved a mean classification accuracy of 99.60% and 99.66% in visual and auditory tests, respectively, significantly outperforming traditional convolutional neural networks (CNN), long short-term memory networks (LSTM), and existing fNIRS classification models (e.g., fNIRS-T, fNIRSNet). Furthermore, leave-one-subject-out cross-validation demonstrates that RDr-C achieves global accuracies of 89.33% and 87.93% on visual and auditory tasks, respectively, with corresponding Kappa coefficients of 0.78 and 0.76, confirming its robustness across individuals. Feature shuffling and wavelet transformation visualizations further confirm robust feature separation, highlighting the model's ability to capture distinct hemodynamic patterns associated with RD. By integrating the spatial feature extraction of GCN, the temporal modeling of BiLSTM, and the global dependency capture of MSA, this work establishes a non-invasive neuroimaging paradigm for educational neuroscience. The high-precision classification lays a technical foundation for early screening tools, with future applications extending to multimodal brain-computer interfaces and longitudinal intervention monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.